🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are compensated to talk to Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the month is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the warmer months we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance represents how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the threats that impact society if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.