🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the comments made by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz in the US Open quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose Fritz had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, who Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it offered the chance to beat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else sensibly had the drought of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

The American, 28, is placed number four in the global rankings entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six encounters over third-ranked the German with growing comfort. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite serve and powerful strength on each forehand and backhand are more than adequate to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The past few years has seen the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising speed and fluidity of much shorter men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and hitting a drop shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a quite harsh limitation on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and held the spot. But the next leap, competing against and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing drought of American men lifting grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that exact last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four sets, a win that only seemed tenuous for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued break point after break point, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz finally did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and forced him to use excessive energy to win it. Facing match points in the final game, his first serve floated to heaven. He prolonged the contest twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite ironclad proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of Djokovic, that lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially seem like he believed he could win. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed enough knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating the American to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than almost anyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not just express his emotions or the strategy he felt determined a match, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States not spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in the summer of claiming a major. I hope he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is in fact extremely unlikely for everybody else. {